THE NATIONAL REPORTER
November 13, 2025
By Marcos Padilla
Editor-in-Chief
TNR | Europe
Contributors:
Dr. Henry Wallace — Military Historian and Academic Consultant
Samuel Duarte — Photojournalist and Documentarian of the European Conflict
Marcus B. Green — Specialist in African American Studies and Cultural Memory
Amsterdam, Netherlands – TNR – The recent decision to remove—without public announcement or official ceremony—the plaques honoring African American soldiers fallen during World War II in a U.S. military cemetery located in the Netherlands has generated international outrage, confusion, and concern. The image accompanying this report—solemn rows of white crosses lined perfectly across a field of green, with a small group of soldiers marching as flags wave in the background—contrasts sharply with the reality of the event: the memory of hundreds of African American heroes has been literally unmounted, archived, or displaced without a clear explanation.
This act, ostensibly administrative, challenges far more than protocol: it questions the place the nation grants to African American soldiers who gave their lives fighting Nazism in a world still divided by racism and segregation.
A Memorial That Represented Much More Than a Plaque
The plaques that were removed commemorated members of African American units who served in Europe during World War II, many of whom were assigned to support, logistics, or construction roles due to the racial restrictions enforced in the U.S. Army at the time. Yet thousands of these soldiers entered direct combat, displayed exceptional valor, and paid the ultimate price for a nation that, paradoxically, still did not grant them equal rights.
They were men who fought against the Nazi regime while facing Jim Crow laws, segregated schools, employment discrimination, and racial violence in their own homeland. Their sacrifice was twofold: saving the world from tyranny while simultaneously challenging an injustice that accompanied them from home.
For this reason, the presence of these plaques represented an act of symbolic reparation—an acknowledgment that history cannot be told without them.
The Decision: Administrative Error or Attempt at Silencing?
The removal allegedly took place “for reorganization and maintenance reasons,” according to unofficial military sources. However, the fact that it was carried out with no public notice has raised suspicion and mistrust among veterans’ associations, civil rights organizations, and families of the honored soldiers.
Why would a memorial of such cultural and historical relevance be taken down quietly?
Who authorized the decision?
Where will these plaques be placed now?
None of these questions have an official answer at the time of publication.
Institutional silence opens the door to unsettling interpretations. In times when debates about historical memory, racial justice, and white supremacy have resurfaced in American political discourse, this act cannot be viewed as an isolated occurrence. It is a reminder that the war over memory is still ongoing.
Painful Omissions: The History of African American Soldiers in World War II
More than one million African Americans served during World War II. Many were never properly honored upon their return. A clear example is the 761st Tank Battalion, the famous “Black Panther Tank Battalion,” which fought in the Battle of the Bulge and did not receive official recognition until decades later.
Likewise, soldiers from the 555th Parachute Infantry Battalion—the “Triple Nickles”—were historically rendered invisible despite their courage.
The U.S. military history record carries an unresolved debt to them. And a memorial, no matter how small or modest, is an essential way to repay it. It is an anchor for collective memory, a physical reminder of a forgotten sacrifice.
Removing it without explanation is not a mere maintenance task—it is a fracture in the historical narrative.
International Reactions and the Feeling of Injustice
European and American historians, local Dutch mayors, and Afro-descendant community leaders have begun demanding clarity. On social media, the news has sparked numerous virtual protests, accompanied by the message:
“If they fought for our freedom, we must fight for their memory.”
For many in Europe—where these soldiers died defending nations that were not their own—the act of removing their memorials is perceived as a betrayal of the very concept of freedom for which they gave their lives.
More Than a Plaque: Defending Truth, Protecting History
The image of the military cemetery—serene, orderly, seemingly eternal—conceals the noise of a conflict still alive: the struggle between memory and oblivion. Each cross represents a name, a sacrifice, a story that deserves to be told. But the plaques that were removed symbolized not only individuals, but an entire community that fought a war abroad while facing another at home.
The silent removal of this memorial forces an entire nation to ask itself:
How committed are we, truly, to honoring historical truth—even when it is uncomfortable?
Opinion: Let Silence Never Be the Final Word
In an era where disinformation, historical revisionism, and ideological manipulation are powerful weapons, the responsibility to protect truth and honor those who gave their lives is greater than ever.
African American soldiers who died in World War II were not afforded the privilege of recognition in life; many did not receive it in death either. Allowing their memory to be quietly erased is more than disrespect—it is a historical injustice.
The National Reporter will continue investigating this situation, demanding answers, and defending the right to remember.
Because memory is not archived.
Memory is honored.
And heroes do not disappear—they are spoken, written, and defended.
— THE NATIONAL REPORTER
The National Reporter 
Leave a comment